Sunday, September 18, 2011

Violation Warning Denial of Rights Under Color of Law


VIOLATION WARNING...DENIAL OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW TITLE 18 USC 242 245 42USC>1983 LAW STATUES 



                                                                                      Violation Warning
Denial of Rights under Color of Law
Violation Warnings -18 U.S.C.>242: 18 U.S.C.>245: 42U.S.C.>1983:

Federal Crime Reporting Statues & Obstructing Justice Statues
For Notice on Petitions, for Damages:


Form, COL-Violation Warning, Denial of Rights, under Color of Law > Violation Warning – Title 18 U.S.C > 242, and 18 U.S.C. >245, and also, 42 U.S.C. >1983: For this Document, go to http://www.win2pdf.com for Violation Warning, Denial of Rights, for Notice Form, under Color of Law:

Federal Law provides that it is a crime to violate the Constitutional Rights of a citizen under Color of Law. You can be arrested for this crime and you can also be held personally liable for civil damages. And,
Attempting to Coerce or Deceive a citizen to surrender his Constitutional Rights is a Federal Crime.
Federal Courts have found that ignorance is no excuse. Laws marked 1, 2, and 3, as Titled, 18 U.S.C. >
P art 1 > Chapter 13 >242, and 18 U.S.C. >245, And also, 42 U.S.C. >1983 are here for your review:

(1). Title 18 U.S.C. > Part 1 > Chapter 13 § 242, Deprivation of any Rights, under Color of Law:
Federal law, provides that Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violations of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violations of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

(2). Title 18 U.S.C.>245, Violation of Rights, as Deprivation of Rights, under Color of Law:
Federal law, provides that Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, intimidates or interferes with any person from in participating in or enjoying any benefits, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States; [or] applying for or enjoying  employment, or any perquisite thereof, by any agency of the United States; shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both, and if death results or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life or may be sentenced to death. 

(3). 42 U.S.C. >1983, any party injured or other proceedings, is called for redress, under Color of Law:
Federal law, provides that every person who, under color of any statue, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Colombia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, secured by or immunities the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to party injured in any action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceedings for redress. 

Federal Crime Reporting Statue

The federal offense of failure to disclose a felony, if coupled with some act concealing the felony, such as suppression of evidence, harboring or protecting the person performing the felony, intimidation or harming a witness, or any other act designed to conceal from authorities the fact that a crime has been committed. Title 18 U.S.C. >4, (misprision of felony). Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
A federal judge, or any other government official, is required as part of the Judge’s mandatory administrative duties, to receive any offer of information of a federal crime. If that judge blocks such report, that block is a felony under related Obstruction of justice statues, and constitutes a serious offense. Upon receiving such information, the judge is then required to make it known to a government law enforcement body that is not themselves involved in the crime.

Misprision of a Felony

Misprision of a felony is the offense of failure to inform government authorities of a felony that a person knows about. A person commits the crime of misprision of a felony if that person:
  • Know of a federal crime that the person has witnessed or that has come to the person’s attention, or failed to prevent.
  • Fails to report it to a federal judge or other federal official, (who is not them4elves involved in the crime).  

Another Federal Statue for Forcing A
Federal Officer to Perform a Mandatory Duty

Another federal statute exists for reporting high-level corruption in government:
Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361, action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff. This federal statute permits any citizen to file a lawsuit in the federal courts to obtain a court order requiring a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful acts. This statue is Title 28 U.S.C. > 1361. These two states are among the most powerful tools in hand by Federal officials –including federal judges-and to circumvent the blocks by those in key positions in the three branches of government.  That statute was also repeatedly blocked by federal judges and justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.

OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE STATUTES

Title 18 U.S.C. > 2. Principals, (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States, aids, or abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal, Note: The legislative intent to punish as a principal not only who directly commits an offence and one who “aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures,” another to commit an offense, but also anyone who causes the doing of an act which if done by him directly would render him guilty of an offense against the United States. Case law decisions: Rothenberg v. United States, 1918, 38 S. Ct. 18, 245 U.S. 480, 62 L.Ed.414, and United States v. Giles, 1937, 57 S. Ct.340, 300 U.S. 41, 81 L. Ed. 493.   

Title 18 U.S.C. > 3

Title 18 U.S.C. > 3, Accessory after the Fact. Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States had been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent
his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact. This criminal act was repeatedly
perpetrated by federal judges who not only refused to receive the information about federal crimes-that they must receive as part of their administration duties under Title 18 U.S.C. > 4 and by their acts that hindered the apprehension and trial of the people committing the offenses that Stitch and his group of other former government agents had discovered and sought to report.     

Title 18 U.S.C.> 4

Title 18 U.S.C. > 4 (misprision of felony). Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. Federal judges repeatedly perpetrated this criminal act by blocking the reporting of the federal crimes and not making such information known to proper law enforcement personnel.

Title 18 U.S.C. > 1505

Title 18 U.S.C. > 1505. Whoever corruptly…influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede to due the proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agencies of the United States …shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both. This criminal act occurred several times as federal judges retaliated against Stitch for making the reports.

Title 18 U.S.C. 1510

Title 18 U.S.C. > 1510.Obstruction of criminal investigation. (a) Whoever willfully endeavors by means of bribery to obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statue of the United States by any person to a criminal investigator shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This criminal statue occurred as federal judges refused to receive the evidence that Stitch and his group of government insiders sought to report. Federal judges refused to receive the evidence, retaliated against Stitch for seeking to make the reports, and then rendered orders barring Stitch for the remainder of his life from court access. In this way, Stitch was unable to report the federal crimes (and also unable to use federal defenses against the judicial violations of federally protected rights that were inflicting great harm upon Stitch).                                          

Title 18 U.S.C. 1512

Title 18 U.S.C 1512.Tamering with a witness, victim, or an informant
(b)Whoever knowingly uses intimidation or physical force, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct towards another person, with intent to –
(1) Influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(2) Cause or induce any person to-
(A) Withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding;
(3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement office or judge of the United States of information relating to the communication or possible commission of a Federal offense …shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(c) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from-
(1) Attending or testifying in an official proceeding;
(2) Reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States the commission or possible commission of a federal office…
(3) Arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in connection with a federal offense; or
(4) Causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation revocation preceding, to be sought or instituted, or assisting in such prosecution or proceeding; or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(e) For the purposes of this section-
(1) An official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense; and
(2)The testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not be admissible in evidence or free of a claim of privilege. Federal judges and directly Sacramento district judge Milton Schwartz and San Francisco district judge Marilyn Patel, aided by other judges, retaliated against Stitch when he exercised the mandatory responsibilities under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4, to report federal crimes “to a federal judge”. In this manner they were guilty of criminal acts under several criminal statutes.                         


Title 18 U.S.C. > 1513

Title 18 U.S.C. >1513.Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant.
(a)Whoever knowing engages in any conduct and thereby causes bodily injury to another person
or damages the tangible property of another person, or threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate against any person for (1) the attendance of a witness of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any record, document, or other abject produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or (2) any information relating to the commission or possible commission of a federal offense…  

Title 18 U.S.C. > 1111

Title 18 U.S.C. >1111.Impeding certain officers or employees. Whoever….intimidates, or interferes with any person….while engaged in….the performance of his official duties shall be fined….or imprisoned….This crime occurred as management personnel at United Airlines and within the FAA interfered with FAA inspectors attempts to report major air safety violations and criminal cover-ups of them by false statements to the inspectors and falsified air safety documents. Many fatal crashes occurred between 1958 and 1978 that were caused by or made possible by these criminal activities.
     
Title 42 U.S.C. > 1961
Racketeering Enterprise Statutes and Criteria

Title 42 U.S.C >1961, Definition. As used in this chapter-(1) “racketeering activity” means:
(a) Any act or threat involving…relating to 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations), section 1511 (relation to obstruction of State or local law enforcement), section 1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery or extortion), section 1952 (relating to racketeering…title 42 USC >1962.Prohibited Activities.           
(b) It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce.
(c) It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collections of unlawful debt.
(d) It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsections (a), (b), or (c) of this section….

Warning, you may be in violation of Federal Law and persisting with your demand may lead to your arrest and/or civil damages. Also, understanding that the law provides that you can be held personally and liable, as well as your company or agency.

You are advised, to cease and desist with your demand and seek personal legal counsel if you do not understand the law.
Please attached this document, to my Brief Complaint Petition, as addressing Color of Law Statues.

Notice of Service:
I, Michelle M. Christensen, certify that I personally delivered this notice to named recipient as addressed on, August 1, 2011, at 4:30pm (am/pm) sent by, E-mail: To My Attorney.


3 comments:

  1. excellent article.
    thank you
    ashraf Haroun
    7143818138
    ashrafharoun63@gmail.com

    I intend to forward this message to those that have suffered from CORRUPTION and EXTRINSIC FRAUD and FRAUD UPON THE COURT.

    ReplyDelete
  2. On October 23, 2019, I forwarded a copy of an email I wrote to the Chief Judge of a particular Court of the State of Nevada. But I also forwarded with the email, a comprehensive crime report made by me, reporting the commissions of crimes against the United States of America, complete with the identities and address of the perpetrators. Those materials were sent to a Federal judge, while relying on 18 U.S.C. 4. Before presenting the materials to the Federal Judge, I sought without any success to present evidence of federal crimes to the FBI and the U.S. attorney. Both of whom continue to ignore the Federal criminal offenses reported. It was thought that if the same report came from a Federal judge, the FBI and US Attorney would take the reports more seriously. How did the Federal judge respond to our reporting Federal crimes? By returning only the email and a cover letter failing to acknowledge the Federal crime report we submitted. The Federal judge' cover letter informs that no other Judge in her district will take any action of the Federal criminal report we had also submitted to other Federal judges. We say here - while wondering how you say: That the Federal judge who rejected our report of Federal crimes and refused to report them to Federal investigators, has committed 18 U.S.C. 4

    ReplyDelete
  3. We are the ones who blogged about the Federal judge refusing to forward our report of Federal crimes to Federal investigators and/or prosecutors. We can be reached at: rnwil3@aol.com or Facebook Page titled "The Fraudulent Foreclosure Foxes".

    ReplyDelete