Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry becomes "Private Attorney General"
OFFICIAL LEGAL, JUDICIAL, and CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE and by PUBLIC
PROCLAMATION of Newly Appointed (FL):
· PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
· QUALIFIED CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR
· FEDERAL WITNESS
Pursuant codified by the U.S. CONGRESS 42 U.S.C. 1988 is now newly appointed as “Private Attorney General” and“Qualified Crimina
State: Florida )
) Affidavit of Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry
County: Lee)
COMES NOW, In the Nature of affidavit, Commercial and non-commercial Affidavit, (she has declared upon oath),Constructive Notice, Judicial Notice, Legal Notice, Lawful Notice and Notice of Constitutional and Common law Rights that Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry, a living breathing natural woman now hereby claims the lawful and legal right to act, without prejudice, and authority granted and codified by the U.S. CONGRESS as a “Private Attorney General” and “Qualified Crimin
In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, I, / Expressed Procurato Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarryr and as of the political distinction of “We the People” as one of the member to be “One of the People” and a “Sovereign” without subjects as lawfully declared in his publicly listed records pursuant to Florida Statutes 222.17 “Declaration of Domicile” herewith give my authorization and consent to any member of Congress and/or her designate staff assistant, to make a proper inquiry on my behalf concerning the appended Private/Public Bill.
The U.S. Congress’ Enactment of 42 U.S.C. § 1988, codifies the ‘Private Attorney General’ principle, which “offer” is herewith accepted on behalf of an injured party, Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry / “Private Attorney General”, hereafter “” in pursuing action Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry on this appended Private/Public Bill, which is sponsored by a representative, who has actual authority to bind the government based upon oath and federal, as well as constitutional mandates. A Private/Public Bill is an Act considered or acted upon by the legislature, that helps a single individual or group of citizens by: affording relief from another law; granting a unique benefit; or relieving the individual from legal responsibility for some allegedly wrongful act not otherwise available through statute or the common law, including an alleged or imposed “lack of contract with the government,” culminating in a breech of fiduciary duty and lawful mandates, because of failure to prove a contract and/or to enforce lawful standards by those bearing a requirement so to do, under the four necessary elements thereto. This notice and acceptance of a filing fee creates and solidifies a contract with government for past, present, or future actions, as well as providing written evidence of violations to ALL legal standards contractual or inherent by nature to each citizen via the Constitution and Laws of the United states of America, state of Florida, Laws of Nations, Treaties under Article VI and U.N. Treaties, Tribal Constitution and Laws which afford a government of standing, any contractual relationship/basis, or ownership interest in for those bearing a fiduciary, lawful, or representative position of standing.
Private/Public bills shall be accepted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1492 and 2509 as amended by the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982, which authorizes either house of Congress to refer bills to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims for investigation, and report to the appropriate house as a means of obtaining redress of grievances for an individual or individuals.
The Private/Public Bill for relief is filed related or pertaining to Florida civil dockets as indexed in these public records, et al as shown in the appended Private/Public Bill; the docket numbers can be verified at the locations stated. The Private/Public Bill affirms evidence of multiple constitutional and civil right violations pursuant to 42 USC 1983, which inflicts irreparable harm on Citizens of the State of Florida and of other states and upon .Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry The Private/Public B may identify acts prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 1961 through 18 U.S.C.1968 and by enforcement, commiting the undersigned into “involutary servitude” pursuant to 18 PaCS 2902 under “full faith and credit”. See also 8 U.S.C. 1481.
Both statutes pursuant to RICO and The Clayton Act bring to bear the pressure of “private attorneys general” on a serious national problem for which public prosecutorial resources are deemed inadequate; the mechanism chosen to reach the objective in both the Clayton Act and RICO is the carrot of treble damages. [Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates] [107S.Ct. 2759, 483 U.S. 143, 151 (1987)]
In rejecting a significantly different focus under RICO, therefore, we are honoring an analogy that Congress itself accepted and relied upon, and one that promotes the objectives of civil RICO as readily as it furthers the objects of the Clayton Act. Both statutes share a common congressional objective of encouraging civil litigation to supplement Government efforts to deter and penalize the respectively prohibited practices. The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity. at 187 (citing Malley-Duff, 483 U.S., at 151 ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose of encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate"). The provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner the better. [Rotella v. Wood et al., 528 U.S. 549 (2000)]
The “Private Attorney General” holds that a successful private party plaintiff is entitled to recovery of her legal expenses, including attorney fees, if she has advanced the policy inherent in public interest legislation on behalf of a significant class of persons. See: Dasher v. Housing Authority of City of Atlanta, Ga., D.C.Ga., 64 F.R.D. 720, 722. See also Equal Access to Justice Act.
In Mallory v. Harkness, 923 F. Supp. 1546 (S.D. Fla. 1996) aff ’d, 109 F.3d 771 (11th Cir. 1997), the district court awarded fees against the intervenor-Attorney General and distinguished Zipes as follows:
The Zipes Court concluded that making blameless intervenors liable for attorney’s fees simply did not further the purposes behind the fee shifting statutes. Thus, Zipes appears to establish the following rule: where a losing intervenor is "innocent," attorney’s fees will not be awarded against that intervenor unless the intervention was frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation. The intervenor in Zipes, however, substantially differs from the AG in the case at hand. In Zipes, the intervenor entered the case late in the litigation to defend the rights of a third-party to the litigation . In contrast, the AG entered the case early in the proceedings and vigorously defended the constitutionality of the statute throughout the entire proceeding. It appears to the Court that the AG took all steps ordinarily taken by a defendant and, in fact, acted as the defendant in the case. Given these facts, characterizing the AG as an "innocent" or"blameless" intervenor would be inaccurate. The AG in the present case clearly played a pivotal role. The AG defended the unconstitutional statute voluntarily and in doing so attempted to aid in the offending statute’s enforcement.923 F. Supp. at 1553 (emphasis added).
We are persuaded by the reasoning of these courts. While legislatures enjoy immunity for promulgating statutes, it makes little sense to provide them with this immunity when they step out of that role. However, when a legislature feels it necessary to perform what is generally regarded as an
executive function because the state executive branch officials named as defendants in their official capacities refuse to perform that function,3 the legislature is the functional equivalent of a defendant in the case—without it, there would be no case. This is very different than the situation contemplated in Zipes, where the intervenor sought to protect the interests of a third-party; regardless of the intervenor, there was an underlying ongoing dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant. To read Zipes as
contemplating situations like the one before us, and the ones at issue in May, Daggett, and Mallory, would be an over-extension of Zipes and would thwart the purpose of the fee-shifting statutes. Moreover, we find the Legislature’s reliance on Thorstenn v. Barnard, 883 F.2d 217 (3d Cir. 1989), to be misplaced, as we explain in the margin. 4 Thus, In the federal system, the Attorney General defends the constitutionality of an act of Congress whenever a reasonable argument can be made in defense of the act. See "The Attorney General’s Duty to Defend the Constitutionality of Statutes," 5 U.S. Op. Off. Legal Counsel 25, 1981 WL 30934. If the Attorney General is unable to defend an act of Congress, the Senate Legal Counsel is notified and may undertake the representation. See 2 U.S.C. S 288k.
An Unrebutted Affidavit Stands as Truth
“Court of Appeals may not assume the truth of allegations in a pleading which are contradicted by affidavit. Where affidavits are directly conflicting on material points. It is not possible for the district judge to “weight” the affidavits in order to resolve disputed issues; except in those rare cases where the facts alleged in an affidavit are inherently incredible, and can be so characterized solely by a reading of the affidavit, the district judge has no basis for a determination of credibility.” Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Tech. Assocs., Inc. 557 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1977)
I declare under penalties of perjury under the Laws of God, Laws of Nations, All Treaties, Laws of the Constitutions and the United States of America and of the state of Florida that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my ability.
Sworn to this 21st day of September, 2011.
All of this affiant further sayth not,
Executed this 21 day of September 2011.
______________________________
Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry- All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
** ALL NOTICES HAVE BEEN MAILED and WILL ATTEST TO MAILING BY NOTARY LISTED*
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice,
Respectfully submitted,
______________________________
Signature / Autograph
Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry
3405 Hanna Ave N
Lehigh Acres Fl, 33971
OFFICIAL LEGAL, JUDICIAL, and CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE and by PUBLIC
PROCLAMATION of Newly Appointed (FL):
· PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
· QUALIFIED CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR
· FEDERAL WITNESS
Pursuant codified by the U.S. CONGRESS 42 U.S.C. 1988 is now newly appointed as “Private Attorney General” and“Qualified Crimina
State: Florida )
) Affidavit of Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry
County: Lee)
COMES NOW, In the Nature of affidavit, Commercial and non-commercial Affidavit, (she has declared upon oath),Constructive Notice, Judicial Notice, Legal Notice, Lawful Notice and Notice of Constitutional and Common law Rights that Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry, a living breathing natural woman now hereby claims the lawful and legal right to act, without prejudice, and authority granted and codified by the U.S. CONGRESS as a “Private Attorney General” and “Qualified Crimin
In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, I, / Expressed Procurato Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarryr and as of the political distinction of “We the People” as one of the member to be “One of the People” and a “Sovereign” without subjects as lawfully declared in his publicly listed records pursuant to Florida Statutes 222.17 “Declaration of Domicile” herewith give my authorization and consent to any member of Congress and/or her designate staff assistant, to make a proper inquiry on my behalf concerning the appended Private/Public Bill.
The U.S. Congress’ Enactment of 42 U.S.C. § 1988, codifies the ‘Private Attorney General’ principle, which “offer” is herewith accepted on behalf of an injured party, Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry / “Private Attorney General”, hereafter “” in pursuing action Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry on this appended Private/Public Bill, which is sponsored by a representative, who has actual authority to bind the government based upon oath and federal, as well as constitutional mandates. A Private/Public Bill is an Act considered or acted upon by the legislature, that helps a single individual or group of citizens by: affording relief from another law; granting a unique benefit; or relieving the individual from legal responsibility for some allegedly wrongful act not otherwise available through statute or the common law, including an alleged or imposed “lack of contract with the government,” culminating in a breech of fiduciary duty and lawful mandates, because of failure to prove a contract and/or to enforce lawful standards by those bearing a requirement so to do, under the four necessary elements thereto. This notice and acceptance of a filing fee creates and solidifies a contract with government for past, present, or future actions, as well as providing written evidence of violations to ALL legal standards contractual or inherent by nature to each citizen via the Constitution and Laws of the United states of America, state of Florida, Laws of Nations, Treaties under Article VI and U.N. Treaties, Tribal Constitution and Laws which afford a government of standing, any contractual relationship/basis, or ownership interest in for those bearing a fiduciary, lawful, or representative position of standing.
Private/Public bills shall be accepted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1492 and 2509 as amended by the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982, which authorizes either house of Congress to refer bills to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims for investigation, and report to the appropriate house as a means of obtaining redress of grievances for an individual or individuals.
The Private/Public Bill for relief is filed related or pertaining to Florida civil dockets as indexed in these public records, et al as shown in the appended Private/Public Bill; the docket numbers can be verified at the locations stated. The Private/Public Bill affirms evidence of multiple constitutional and civil right violations pursuant to 42 USC 1983, which inflicts irreparable harm on Citizens of the State of Florida and of other states and upon .Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry The Private/Public B may identify acts prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 1961 through 18 U.S.C.1968 and by enforcement, commiting the undersigned into “involutary servitude” pursuant to 18 PaCS 2902 under “full faith and credit”. See also 8 U.S.C. 1481.
Both statutes pursuant to RICO and The Clayton Act bring to bear the pressure of “private attorneys general” on a serious national problem for which public prosecutorial resources are deemed inadequate; the mechanism chosen to reach the objective in both the Clayton Act and RICO is the carrot of treble damages. [Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates] [107S.Ct. 2759, 483 U.S. 143, 151 (1987)]
In rejecting a significantly different focus under RICO, therefore, we are honoring an analogy that Congress itself accepted and relied upon, and one that promotes the objectives of civil RICO as readily as it furthers the objects of the Clayton Act. Both statutes share a common congressional objective of encouraging civil litigation to supplement Government efforts to deter and penalize the respectively prohibited practices. The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity. at 187 (citing Malley-Duff, 483 U.S., at 151 ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose of encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate"). The provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner the better. [Rotella v. Wood et al., 528 U.S. 549 (2000)]
The “Private Attorney General” holds that a successful private party plaintiff is entitled to recovery of her legal expenses, including attorney fees, if she has advanced the policy inherent in public interest legislation on behalf of a significant class of persons. See: Dasher v. Housing Authority of City of Atlanta, Ga., D.C.Ga., 64 F.R.D. 720, 722. See also Equal Access to Justice Act.
In Mallory v. Harkness, 923 F. Supp. 1546 (S.D. Fla. 1996) aff ’d, 109 F.3d 771 (11th Cir. 1997), the district court awarded fees against the intervenor-Attorney General and distinguished Zipes as follows:
The Zipes Court concluded that making blameless intervenors liable for attorney’s fees simply did not further the purposes behind the fee shifting statutes. Thus, Zipes appears to establish the following rule: where a losing intervenor is "innocent," attorney’s fees will not be awarded against that intervenor unless the intervention was frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation. The intervenor in Zipes, however, substantially differs from the AG in the case at hand. In Zipes, the intervenor entered the case late in the litigation to defend the rights of a third-party to the litigation . In contrast, the AG entered the case early in the proceedings and vigorously defended the constitutionality of the statute throughout the entire proceeding. It appears to the Court that the AG took all steps ordinarily taken by a defendant and, in fact, acted as the defendant in the case. Given these facts, characterizing the AG as an "innocent" or"blameless" intervenor would be inaccurate. The AG in the present case clearly played a pivotal role. The AG defended the unconstitutional statute voluntarily and in doing so attempted to aid in the offending statute’s enforcement.923 F. Supp. at 1553 (emphasis added).
We are persuaded by the reasoning of these courts. While legislatures enjoy immunity for promulgating statutes, it makes little sense to provide them with this immunity when they step out of that role. However, when a legislature feels it necessary to perform what is generally regarded as an
executive function because the state executive branch officials named as defendants in their official capacities refuse to perform that function,3 the legislature is the functional equivalent of a defendant in the case—without it, there would be no case. This is very different than the situation contemplated in Zipes, where the intervenor sought to protect the interests of a third-party; regardless of the intervenor, there was an underlying ongoing dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant. To read Zipes as
contemplating situations like the one before us, and the ones at issue in May, Daggett, and Mallory, would be an over-extension of Zipes and would thwart the purpose of the fee-shifting statutes. Moreover, we find the Legislature’s reliance on Thorstenn v. Barnard, 883 F.2d 217 (3d Cir. 1989), to be misplaced, as we explain in the margin. 4 Thus, In the federal system, the Attorney General defends the constitutionality of an act of Congress whenever a reasonable argument can be made in defense of the act. See "The Attorney General’s Duty to Defend the Constitutionality of Statutes," 5 U.S. Op. Off. Legal Counsel 25, 1981 WL 30934. If the Attorney General is unable to defend an act of Congress, the Senate Legal Counsel is notified and may undertake the representation. See 2 U.S.C. S 288k.
An Unrebutted Affidavit Stands as Truth
“Court of Appeals may not assume the truth of allegations in a pleading which are contradicted by affidavit. Where affidavits are directly conflicting on material points. It is not possible for the district judge to “weight” the affidavits in order to resolve disputed issues; except in those rare cases where the facts alleged in an affidavit are inherently incredible, and can be so characterized solely by a reading of the affidavit, the district judge has no basis for a determination of credibility.” Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Tech. Assocs., Inc. 557 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1977)
I declare under penalties of perjury under the Laws of God, Laws of Nations, All Treaties, Laws of the Constitutions and the United States of America and of the state of Florida that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my ability.
Sworn to this 21st day of September, 2011.
All of this affiant further sayth not,
Executed this 21 day of September 2011.
______________________________
Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry- All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
** ALL NOTICES HAVE BEEN MAILED and WILL ATTEST TO MAILING BY NOTARY LISTED*
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice,
Respectfully submitted,
______________________________
Signature / Autograph
Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry
3405 Hanna Ave N
Lehigh Acres Fl, 33971
Hello, I am seeking advice from a private attorney general in common law.
ReplyDeleteHELLO
ReplyDeleteI am interested in becoming a "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL " From State of Florida . Can anyone provide any info .
State constitution's bill of rights, point a path to, in the event of corruption and incapacity, to people policing the police, meeting the the a.g. To discuss what can be really done, given real politic, and the natural sovereignty to looking into a matter in the interests of the people. At this level government must cease its civilized bluster as the greatest power, and create an atmosphere conducive to discussion, whereby the whole of crime may be eliminated, for the public good. Ask yourself why you don't understand crime is never the first choice, but a direct function of a limited society. State constitutions: N.J.
ReplyDelete2. a. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, and they have the right at all times to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it."
Missouri Missouri: Thus: "the people over internal affairs, constitution and form of government. Section 3. That the people of this state have the inherent, sole and exclusive right to regulate the internal government and police thereof, and to alter and abolish their constitution and form of government whenever they may deem it necessary to their safety and happiness, provided such change be not repugnant to the Constitution of the United States."
Missouri, "Source of political power--origin, basis and aim of government. Section 1. That all political power is vested in and derived from the people; that all government of right originates from the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole"
There are limitations to this provision. A Private Attorney can act as a Private Attorney General. A Private (non attorney) Citizen CANNOT act in the capacity of a Private Attorney General.
ReplyDeleteHowever there are some loop holes in which a Private (non attorney) Citizen may b able to act in the capacity of a Private Attorney General. If the case at bar is a Civil RICO (18 USC 1964) matter. Depending upon their knownledge they could combine Amicus Curiae (no attorney credentials required) with the intent to act in the best interest of the general public, one may embrace 42 USC 1988 to proceed in the RICO action as a Private Attorney General.
A perfect example would be the current financial crisis in Puerto Rico in which the ordinary people are paying a series of taxes which they don't agree with and are not benefiting from. The sales tax were initiated to pay off the bonds which never happened. Where is the money going? Puerto Rico needs a Private Attorney General to sue in the interest of the taxpayers.
With power of attorney granted one may represent another without being a Lawyer. Lawyers have no licence. They are merely members of a corrupt club called the B.A.R.
DeleteWith power of attorney granted one may represent another without being a Lawyer. Lawyers have no licence. They are merely members of a corrupt club called the B.A.R.
DeleteHi iam Anthony I would like to join I have knowledge of law all law I would like to meet with you. All my# is 7372229831
ReplyDeleteHi iam Anthony I would like to join I have knowledge of law all law I would like to meet with you. All my# is 7372229831
ReplyDeletei HAVE A LAW DEGREE, AND i ACTUAlly resigned my bar card so that I could act as Private Attorney General as that term is actually meant. A PAGA is like the producer of a play or the director of a movie - you put all the pieces together devise the strategies and hire everyone from the actual Bar attorney advocate to the ringers and under cover actors that will infiltrate the proposed Defendants operation. One uses Bounty Hunters to replace the Law Enforcement agents otherwise available to the Public Lawyers, such as the US Attorneys Offices or the Attorney General's office of the various states. This is NOT something that untrained people full of exuberance should do. This is not something that will allow you to represent another individual in a duly constituted tribunal of any jurisdiction in the US. Furthermore, you cannot 'self proclaim' yourself as a PAGA. You actually have to engage in working cases that fit the paradigm and be trained to to so; after you have brought a number of cases to completion, participating in each case in a different role: Investigator, Counselor, Ringer, Expert, Intel Analyst, Go-Fer, Researcher, Auditor, etc. Please, do not get into trouble trying to do what you think a PAGA does. However, you can volunteer at your local Legal Services Center, as well as go to a California Law School Online, and get both experience and education.
ReplyDeleteGod Bless Y'all.
Bringing class action suits are the most rewarding...but doing "drive by Google earth" lawsuits is not honorable.
ReplyDeleteBringing class action suits are the most rewarding...but doing "drive by Google earth" lawsuits is not honorable.
ReplyDeletewhat is the process to becoming a Private Attorney General. It was my understanding that all citizens like myself were Private Attorney Generals for our STRAWMAN. Like I am {The Acting Private Attorney General for the United States Commercial Construction Contract of JAMES PATRICK FLEMMING}
ReplyDeleteThe Private Attorney General is expertly explained here. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99447-Rod-Class-his-many-hoaxes
ReplyDeleteFOR THE TRUTH ABOUT BECOMING A "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL", SEE THE FIRST (1st) COMMENT HERE. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99447-Rod-Class-his-many-hoaxes.
ReplyDeleteTHE HOAXES OF DEBORAH TAVARES & ROD CLASS (legal hoaxes begin at number 7). For proof about these hoaxes, click here. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?105568-The-Hoaxes-of-Deborah-Tavares&p=1267477#post1267477
ReplyDelete1. "The NASA War Document Hoax". The document is REAL, but has been "modified" to fit the hoax. It now has a FAKE and misleading TITLE and COVER. But, the hoax is NOT the document anyway. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares' OWN fraudulent claims that THE DOCUMENT ALONE, ALL BY ITSELF, WITHOUT MORE, CONSTITUTES "PROOF" that NASA is already killing us all with diabolical weapons in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so. NASA actually created and used this very document to urge American defense contractors to develop countermeasures against the diabolical weapons described therein in an effort to prevent any planned extinction of mankind. NASA may actually be killing us all with diabolical weapons in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THIS PARTICULAR DOCUMENT ITSELF (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provides no support for that proposition, because it was actually created and used in an effort TO PREVENT such an occurrence.
2. "The Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars Hoax". The document is REAL, but it is only POLITICAL FICTION. It has also been "modified" to fit the hoax. It now has a FAKE, recently-added paragraph at the beginning which fraudulently indicates that it is the work of "The Bilderbergs". But, the hoax is NOT the document anyway. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares' OWN fraudulent claims that THE DOCUMENT ALONE, ALL BY ITSELF, WITHOUT MORE, CONSTITUTES "PROOF" that "The Bilderbergs" adopted a plan in 1954 to kill us all with diabolical "silent weapons" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so. This document is actually POLITICAL FICTION and is a DISGUISED COMPLAINT about the treason and horrors suffered by U.S. soldiers when the U.S. government allegedly allowed them to be killed at Pearl Harbor in order to draw us into World War II. This 44 page booklet has NOTHING to do with the Bilderbergs. The Bilderbergs may actually be killing us all with diabolical "silent weapons" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THIS PARTICULAR DOCUMENT ITSELF (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provides no support for that proposition, because it is actually POLITICAL FICTION.
3. "The Report From Iron Mountain Hoax". The document is REAL, but it is only POLITICAL SATIRE. So, the hoax is NOT the document itself. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares' OWN fraudulent claims that THE DOCUMENT ALONE, ALL BY ITSELF, WITHOUT MORE, CONSTITUTES "PROOF" that ALL "environmental calamities" (including climate change, drought, fires, etc.) ARE FAKE ("engineered") and that they are created by the U.S. Government to justify "FAKE WARS" (described in the book) against these FAKE ("engineered") environmental calamities to prop up the U.S. economy and that the U.S. Government uses these FAKE ("engineered") environmental calamities as "weapons" to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so. This document is actually POLITICAL SATIRE and is a DISGUISED COMPLAINT WHICH OPENLY MOCKS U.S. policy of engaging in perpetual wars to prop up the U.S. economy. The premise of the book is that if we ever run out of REAL enemies to justify our wars, we will have to make up FAKE enemies (like "FAKE environmental calamities" and "FAKE alien life forms") to justify our wars. The U.S Government may actually be killing us all with FAKE ("engineered") "environmental calamities" (including climate change, drought, fires, etc.) in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THIS PARTICULAR DOCUMENT ITSELF (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provides no support for that proposition, because it is actually POLITICAL SATIRE.
ReplyDelete4. "The Agenda 21 Hoax". The document is REAL. So, the hoax is NOT the document itself. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares' OWN fraudulent claims that THE DOCUMENT ALONE, ALL BY ITSELF, WITHOUT MORE, CONSTITUTES "PROOF" that the United Nations is forcing us out or our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so. According to the "Agenda 21" document itself (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim), its purpose is to SLOW DOWN the rate at which the environment is destroyed. It would have PROTECTED THE REMAINING FORESTS, REDUCED DROUGHT and INSURED AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER not contaminated by SEWAGE. Agenda 21 was first presented to the public at the "EARTH SUMMIT" (an environmental conference) in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil in 1992. It was only a SUGGESTION that member nations were permitted, BUT NOT REQUIRED TO ADOPT for themselves. Agenda 21 does not apply in the United States because it is not the law in the United States and therefore cannot be enforced in the United States. Contrary to Deborah Tavares' fraudulent claims, there is NOTHING in the Agenda 21 document itself (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) which suggests we will be forced out of our rural or suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. NOTHING! The United Nations may actually be forcing us out of our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THIS PARTICULAR DOCUMENT ITSELF (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provides no support for that proposition, because it does not address those particular subjects. (See Post #124 for some of the text of Agenda 21. See Post #166 for detailed information about Agenda 21).
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete5. "The PG&E Satellite Beams Hoax". THE DOCUMENTS ARE FORGERIES AND THE ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN THOSE FORGERIES ARE VERIFIABLY FALSE. PG&E is a California electrical utility company which collects and generates electricity in a variety of ways. But, PG&E's conventional solar panels can only collect energy from the Sun during the middle of daylight hours. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future it would use solar panels on satellites in space to collect energy from the Sun 24 hours a day, then beam it to earth using lasers or radio frequencies and then convert it to electricity here on earth for its customers. When the recent forest fires burned northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and this technology for starting those fires. But, the scientific literature and PG&E's own documents indicated that this technology did not yet exist. SO, TO REBUT ALL THAT INFORMATION, Deborah Tavares FORGED a series of FAKE emails (purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this technology already existed, that it was already in use and that it could be used to start fires. Thus, Deborah Tavares herself actually created the very FORGERIES which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE "PROOF" that PG&E used this technology to ignite the recent fires in California to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about these FORGED emails are not so. These FORGED EMAILS prove nothing except that Deborah Tavares is a fraud.
ReplyDelete6. The Genocide Agreement Hoax". The document is REAL. So, the hoax is NOT the document itself. The "Genocide Agreement" is actually the nickname of a proposed 1940's United Nations agreement BANNING GENOCIDE among signatory nations. The proposed "Genocide Agreement" DEFINED "GENOCIDE" BROADLY and also banned the displacement of people from their homes. Further, under the proposed "Genocide Agreement", the United Nations would have the jurisdiction to criminally prosecute and punish individual CITIZENS of signatory nations who violated the terms of the agreement (like the Nuremberg Trials and The Nuremberg Hangings). In the 1980's, the United States signed the "Genocide Agreement", despite these concerns. So, the hoax is not the document itself. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares' OWN fraudulent claims that the Genocide Agreement ONLY BANS "NATIONS" FROM COMMITTING ACTS OF GENOCIDE and that THE UNITED STATES IS "NOT A NATION", BECAUSE "IT IS A CORPORATION" (which is not governed by the agreement or the ban) which permits the United States to commit genocide on a "Day-by-Day" basis, which is why "WE ARE BEING EXTERMINATED". THE TRUTH: But, the United States is not really a "corporation" and the Genocide Agreement actually bans genocide in the United States and subjects those who commit genocide and displacement to the criminal jurisdiction of the United Nations. The hoax is also Deborah Tavares' OWN (ENTIRELY INCONSISTENT) claims that the genocide agreement DOES APPLY IN THE UNITED STATES and that it "INVADES DOMESTIC LAWS" and "ALLOWS FOREIGNERS TO 'OVER-RIDE' U.S. laws". (Note that if the Genocide Agreement really "DID NOT APPLY" to the United States because it is a "CORPORATION" as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims above, it would be impossible for the Genocide Agreement to apply in the United States which would make it impossible for the Genocide Agreement to "invade" or "over-ride" any law in the United States.). THE TRUTH: Regardless, the Genocide Agreement applies in the United States, but only over-rides U.S. law as to the specific acts banned by the agreement, GENOCIDE and DISPLACEMENT.
7. "The Judge DALE Hoax". ALL OF THE "JUDGE DALE FORGERIES" ARE ENTIRELY FAKE. Further, EVERY SINGLE CLAIM MADE IN THE JUDGE DALE FORGERIES IS ALSO ENTIRELY FALSE. Deborah Tavares, Al Whitney (real name "Anita Larin") and amateur legal theorist, Rodney "DALE" Class wrote every single word of these FORGERIES (including "The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America" and "The Matrix And The US Constitution"). But, they fraudulently told the American people they were written by a "retired federal judge" named "Judge DALE" which uses Rodney "DALE" Class' middle name, "DALE", as an inside joke on the American people. The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that their government and their justice system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.
ReplyDelete8. "The Court Registry Investment System Hoax". THE DOCUMENT IS FAKE. Deborah Tavares and her partners assembled this FAKE document from parts of REAL government documents and then ALTERED and CHANGED the WORDS and IMAGES to make it fit the hoax. Deborah Tavares' fraudulently claims that this FAKE document itself constitutes actual conclusive "proof" that all of the money collected by the courts in fines and penalties is forwarded on to the Federal Reserve. The purpose of this hoax, like the "Judge DALE Hoax" above, was to make Americans think that their justice system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.
9. "The All Governments And Agencies Are Private, For-Profit Corporations Hoax". This hoax involves several false documents and videos. In this hoax, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that all governments and agencies are actually private, for-profit corporations "posing" as governments and agencies which "profit" by taxing, burdening and abusing the American people. To support this claim, Deborah Tavares cites examples of several ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS which happen to have names that SOUND SIMILAR to the names of governments and agencies (like "Federal Express" for example). But, contrary to her claims, NONE of the ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS she cites in support of this hoax are really governments or agencies. Not one. Deborah Tavares also fraudulently CHANGES THE REAL NAME of one such ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION to a FAKE NAME to make it fit the hoax (from "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc." to "Internal Revenue Service"). This hoax was designed to make Americans think that all governments and agencies are completely illegal, invalid, illegitimate, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.
10. "The Rod Class Has Obtained His Forth Administrative Ruling That All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' Hoax'". This hoax involves several FAKE press releases (co-authored by Deborah Tavares) and false videos. Note that this hoax was actually created in support of the hoax above to the effect that all governments are private, for-profit corporations (a Deborah Tavares hoax). The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that our state and local government agencies (including the DMV and local police departments) are completely illegal, invalid, illegitimate, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.
11. "The... Property Into Other Peoples' Name Hoax". This hoax involves several FAKE press releases and false videos. In this hoax, Rod Class and his partners (including Deborah Tavares) fraudulently claim that "a North Carolina judge has warned all [in-state] police officers to put their property into other peoples' names" (to make it look like the public can successfully sue police officers personally because they are merely "private contractors" impersonating public servants who issue traffic tickets to generate "profits" for their "corporate employers"). Note that this hoax was actually created in support of the hoax above to the effect that all governments and agencies are private, for-profit corporations (a Deborah Tavares hoax). The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that our local police agencies and their officers are completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical, that they can be successfully sued for issuing traffic tickets and to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.
ReplyDelete12. "The FAKE Jim Traficant Speech Hoax". This hoax involves a FAKE and FORGED "transcript" of a speech that a Congressman allegedly made to Congress to the effect that our federal government went bankrupt in 1933. (The REAL transcript of this speech is in the official Congressional Record and does NOT say this.). This FAKE and FORGED document is actually posted on Deborah Tavares' own website. The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that they themselves are collateral and debt slaves who exist solely to repay international bankers and to make Americans think that our government is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.
13. "The Sovereign Citizen Hoax". This hoax involves a FAKE and FORGED document written by Rodney "DALE" Class while pretending to be "Judge DALE". This FAKE document was posted on the website of Al Whitney (real name "Anita Larin") who, like Rod Class, is also Deborah Tavares' partner in these hoaxes. The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that ONLY INDIVIDUALS ARE "SOVEREIGN" and that "WE THE PEOPLE" (a plural term) collectively, as a whole (in the form of our elected government) ARE NOT "SOVEREIGN" (exactly backwards to the truth), such that our laws do not apply to INDIVIDUALS (the pretend "sovereigns"). But, none of this is so. The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that "We the PEOPLE" (a plural term) collectively, as a whole (in the form of our elected government) have no right to enforce our own laws, made by our own ELECTED lawmakers, against any INDIVIDUAL and to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.
REMEMBER, "PATTERNS" NEVER LIE!
For the hoaxes of ROD CLASS, click here.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...70#post1174970.
For the hoaxes of EDDIE CRAIG, click here.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...70#post1174970
ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.
The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.
DEBORAH TAVARES & THE PG&E FAKE EMAIL HOAX (THE CALIFORNIA FIRES HOAX)
ReplyDeleteMore Deborah Tavares hoaxes. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?105568-The-Hoaxes-of-Deborah-Tavares
VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX (Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 11:10-20:00)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3fb--FC_oQ (at 1:05-3:40)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7As3d9NgDyk (at 27:20-30:10)
In the PG&E FAKE Email Hoax, Deborah Tavares claims to have obtained emails which effectively prove that PG&E caused the recent forest fires in California by beaming energy beams from satellites in space at California forests. But, her claims about these emails are false. They are FORGERIES.
Pacific Gas & Electric ("PG&E") is a California electrical utility company. Over the next few years, PG&E is required by law to generate an increasingly higher and higher percentage of its electrical power without producing any carbon emissions. So, PG&E has increasingly resorted to wind, solar and thermal technology to generate electrical power.
But, PG&E's conventional, ground-based, solar panels can only collect energy from the Sun during the middle of daylight hours in good weather. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future, solar panels on satellites in space might be used to generate energy from the Sun 24 hours a day. These satellites might then beam the power to Earth in the form of laser beams or radio frequency beams. The power might then be received at receptor stations on Earth and then converted to electricity for it customers to use.
WHAT PG&E HAS SAID ABOUT THIS IDEA SINCE 2009:
https://www.pge.com/en_US/small-medi...se_link-energy
Solaren is a private California company which has patented the technology described above. In 2009, PG&E entered into a contract with Solaren to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electrical power using this technology. Under the contract, Solaren would own, operate and control all its satellites, rectennas and all the receiver stations. Originally, Solaren promised to provide PG&E with this finished electricity by 2016. But, it ran into financial problems and still has not provided any electricity, even at this late date. The California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") approved the contract on the condition that no money from PG&E customers ever be used to develop this technology.
THE CONTRACT IS DISCRIBED HERE:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34239347/n.../#.XHRAB1KFPIU (at paragraphs 1-5)
https://www.afcea.org/content/space-...closer-reality(at paragraphs 8, 9 & 10)
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/(at the final two paragraphs)
https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7(at the final two paragraphs)
Deborah Tavares lives in Sebastopol and opposes PG&E "smart meters". So, when the recent forest fires burned northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and the technology described above for starting those fires. But, the scientific and economic literature and PG&E's own documents indicated that this technology did not yet exist.
CURRENT SCIENTIFIC & ECONOMIC LITERATURE ON THIS TECHNOLOGY:
ReplyDeleteThis technology will not be in use until the end of the decade. See the last 3 paragraphs and the final sentence here. https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7
This technology did not exist in 2017. Beginning at the bottom of page 16 here.
https://space.nss.org/media/NSS-JOUR...olar-Power.pdf
This technology is not in use in 2019. See the last paragraph. https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower.
This technology did not exist in 2018. See the FIRST and LAST paragraph here. http://earthsky.org/earth/space-base...ser-to-reality
This technology will not be in use until at least 2019. See page 62 http://fiso.spiritastro.net/telecon/...e_12-14-16.pdf
This technology did not exist in 2018. See the final paragraph. http://www.alternative-energy-news.i...ls-into-orbit/
SO, TO REBUT ALL THOSE FACTS, Deborah Tavares FORGED a series of FAKE emails (purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this beam technology already existed, that it was already in use and that it could be used to kill us all.
THE FORGERIES:
PUBLISHED EMAIL FORGERIES: http://stopthecrime.net/wp/2018/08/2...rn-california/
Afterwards, Deborah Tavares created more FORGED emails reflecting imaginary responses from imaginary experts to which Deborah Tavares allegedly forwarded her FORGED emails above. Not surprisingly, these imaginary experts agreed with Deborah Tavares that this beam technology already existed, that it has long been in use and that it could be used to kill us all.
TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES AT ABOUT 20% THROUGH THE TEXT HERE: http://smartmetersmurder.com/
THE FINAL TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 17:25-18:40)
Thus, Deborah Tavares herself actually created the very FORGERIES which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE "PROOF" that PG&E used this future beam technology to start the recent fires in California to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.
THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THESE PUBLISHED EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:
1. Tavares did not know what "space weather" actually was (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). "Solar flares" on the surface of the Sun erupt about every 11 years or so. These solar flares extend millions of miles into space and emit extremely high amounts of radiation into space. This radiation is called "space weather" (like a "rain" or "storm" OF RADIATION in space). (It is the Earth's atmosphere that protects all life on Earth from this radiation.). The radiation emitted during such "space weather" is so powerful that it can damage or destroy electrical power transformers here on Earth if they are linked to earth-based solar panels. Such damage can result in power outages. That is why "space weather" would be of such concern to PG&E. During "damaging space weather", PG&E has to protect its transformers linked to earth-based solar panels because some such transformers provide electrical power to nuclear power plants and to hospitals which cannot afford power outages for obvious reasons.
DEBORAH TAVARES' MISTAKE:
But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this. She mistakenly believed that "space weather" was WEATHER HERE ON EARTH (like drought and fire) that was artificially created and controlled by lasers, radio frequencies or microwaves beamed at the Earth from satellites IN SPACE (a stupid mistake that a REAL PG&E executive WOULD NOT MAKE).
HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:
ReplyDeleteIn FORGING the phrase "...then have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS, AKA EARTHLINGS, FOR ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENSES RESULTING [FROM DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER]" in the 9:50 email above, Deborah Tavares was referring to the adverse consequences of FIRES WHICH PG&E CAN BLAME ON ITS CUSTOMERS (not realizing that "damaging space weather" is actually radiation in outer space caused by solar flares on the surface of the Sun every 11 years). Unknown to Deborah Tavares, the consequences resulting from "damaging space weather" is actually power outages, NOT FIRES! AND, PG&E CANNOT POSSIBLY BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS FOR ITS OWN POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES ON THE SURFACE OF THE SUN EVERY 11 YEARS. So, in creating this FORGERY, Deborah Tavares did not know that customers can NEVER be "blamed" for the "consequences" of "damaging space weather", WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
2. Likewise, Deborah Tavares did not know the terms of PG&E's contract with Solaren (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). So, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E would never own, operate, manage or control any such satellites, rectennas, receiving stations or have any say in how, when or where energy from satellites in space would be directed. Instead, Solaren would be solely responsible for all of that. Under the contract, all PG&E would ever do would be to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren was ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Under the contract, PG&E is simply a future customer of Solaren. Nothing more. But, Deborah Tavares did not know this.
HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:
In FORGING the sentence, "WE [referring to PG&E] have changed OUR receptor site from the Mojave desert (sic) to Sebastopol" in the 10:03 email above, Deborah Tavares sought to create the illusion that she was so important to PG&E that it actually "targeted" her with radio frequency waves beamed from satellites in space in retaliation for her opposition to PG&E "smart meters". See PROOF here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 18:40-19:20). Are you kidding me?! What a narcissist!
Regardless, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E had no ability to aim Solaren's energy beams or to move Solaren's receptor station from one place to another (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
Further, Deborah Tavares did not know that Solaren's actual receptor site is in Fresno (hundreds of miles away from the Mojave Desert) and that PG&E has no say in where such a Solaren receptor site goes. Moreover, Deborah Tavares did not know that such receiver rectennas are up to six miles in diameter (which would make it visible to every person living in Sebastopol if it had actually had been relocated there as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims).
PROOF THAT FRESNO (NOT SEBASTOPOL) IS THE REAL RECEPTOR SITE:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34239347/n.../#.XHRAB1KFPIU (at the 3rd paragraph)
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/ (at end of 2nd paragraph)
https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower (at the 16th paragraph)
Finally, a REAL PG&E executive would not refer to Solaren's receptor site as "OUR" receptor site, would know that Solaren's receptor station was in Fresno (not in the Mojave Desert) and would know that PG&E had no power or ability to change Solaren's receptor site. The foregoing mistakes prove that this email is a forgery.
let me guess, you're a desperate dis-info agent?
Delete3. Use your own common sense. As to the 10:03 email, how likely is it that a PG&E executive would open an email to the CPUC with a "reminder" of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of exactly how Solaren's technology worked? The CPUC had just approved of PG&E's use of Solaren's technology provided that PG&E never invested any of its customer's money in the project. The CPUC did not need a "reminder" of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of Solaren's technology in which PG&E played no part and could claim no credit. This "reminder" serves NO PURPOSE.
ReplyDelete4. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would refer to PG&E's customers as "EARTHLINGS" in connection with an email about a "COVER UP" of "damaging space weather" which can cause nothing power outages?
5. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would tell PG&E to have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS "AKA EARTHLINGS" FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF "DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER", WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES WHICH CANNOT POSSIBLY BE BLAMED ON PG&E CUSTOMERS. This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THE UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:
1. The sentence, "You as a California resident have every right to know what your "public utilities" are doing with their (sic) "RATE DOLLARS", was not written by an expert, as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims. Unknown to Deborah Tavares, no "rate dollars" from any PG&E customer has or will ever be used to finance the research and development of Solaren's technology (which will be financed, owned and operated solely by Solaren). Under the contract, PG&E would merely be a future customer of Solaren and buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Again, no PG&E customer money will ever be used to develop Solaren's technology. But, Deborah Tavares did not know this when writing this FORGERY. That mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
2. The term, "EARTH, INC." in "comment ONE:" a "signature" term ACTUALLY CREATED, COINED and REPEATEDLY USED BY Deborah Tavares. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...iz.42h9ExblMs8
3. The phrase, "very disturbing" in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares phrase. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...71.ld2pLLtGq-c
4. The term, "FOIA", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...71.MsKCoGqM1QE
5. The term, "iceberg", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...71.brv_lDgjd1o
6. The term, "footprints", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...71.6jJyS4QOIyw
7. The term, "assessment", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...iz.VQSLXAWgla8
8. BOTH "comment ONE:" and "comment TWO:" contain hyphenated terms (" - "), a writing custom rare in today's world, suggesting that BOTH comment ONE and comment TWO were written by the same person, which of course, they were.
PG&E may actually be using laser or radio frequencies beamed from satellites in space to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THESE PARTICULAR FORGED EMAILS THEMSELVES (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provide no support for that proposition, because they are FORGERIES!
ReplyDeleteABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.
The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.
For the hoaxes of CARL MILLER, click here.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...161#post229161.
Or, Google "Carl Miller / Richard Champion".
For the hoaxes of EDDIE CRAIG, click here.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...y-sheriff-hoax.
Or, Google "Eddie Craig" "Former Deputy Sheriff Hoax" (at the same time).
For the hoaxes of ROD CLASS, click here.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...70#post1174970
Or, Google "Rod Class & his many hoaxes"
For the hoaxes of DEBORAH TAVARES, click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...s-depopulation)
Or, Google "The Hoaxes Of Deborah Tavares" "waccobb.net" (at the same time.
COMING SOON! "The Anthony Williams Hoax"
FOR THE ANTHONY WILLIAMS HOAX, GOOGLE "THE ANTHONY WILLIAMS HOAX" ON WACCOBB.NET OR CLICK HERE. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?132863-The-Anthony-Williams-Hoax-(Anthony-Troy-Williams)&p=231721#post231721
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteFor the hoaxes of ROD CLASS, Google "Rod Class And His Many Hoaxes", or click here.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99447-Rod-Class-his-many-hoaxes&p=1174970#post1174970
For the hoaxes of ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Google "The Anthony Williams Hoax", or click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?132863-The-anthony-williams-hoax-(anthony-troy-williams)&p=231677#post231677
For the hoaxes of CARL MILLER, Google "Carl Miller / Richard Champion", or click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?131638-Carl-Miller-Richard-Champion&p=229161#post229161
For the hoaxes of EDDIE CRAIG, Google "Eddie Craig And The Former Deputy Sheriff Hoax", or click here.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99564-Eddie-Craig-the-former-deputy-sheriff-hoax
For the hoaxes of DEBRA JONES, Google "The Debra Jones Hoax", or click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?132369-Debra-Jones-amp-quot-The-Debra-Jones-Hoax-quot&highlight=Debra+Jones&p=230352#post230352;
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?109244-Debra-Jones-The-Debra-Jones-Hoax.
For the hoaxes of DEBORAH TAVARES, Google "The Hoaxes OF Deborah Tavares", or click here. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?130336-The-hoaxes-of-deborah-tavares-(conspiracy-weaponized-weather-fires-depopulation)&p=226016#post226016
ANTHONY WILLIAMS UPDATE
ReplyDeleteA federal jury in Hawaii found Anthony Williams guilty of all 32 counts of wire fraud and mail fraud.
https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2020/03/05/man-behind-bogus-mortgage-debt-reduction-scheme-found-guilty
https://www.khon2.com/local-news/accused-man-found-guilty-of-32-counts-of-wire-and-mail-fraud/amp/
This document reflects many of the actual fraudulent representations that Williams made to his victims. Unfortunately for Williams, he published this fraudulent sales pitch online and he used the telephone and the U.S. Mail to carry out his scheme. This made Williams' conduct a federal offense. http://sovcitbullshit.com/anthony-troy-williams/pacer/D.Hawaii_1_17-cr-00101-LEK_285_2.pdf;
This is the actual Superseding Indictment. This document reflects the actual charges that the jury found Williams guilty of. Note that this Indictment also charges Williams' co-conspirators. But, the co-conspirators later entered into plea deals and testified against Anthony Williams.
http://sovcitbullshit.com/anthony-troy-williams/pacer/D.Hawaii_1_17-cr-00101-LEK_154_0.pdf
ANTHONY WILLIAMS GUILTY OF WIRE FRAUD AND MAIL FRAUD
ReplyDeleteMARCH, 2020: A federal jury in Hawaii has just found Anthony Williams guilty of all 32 counts of wire fraud and mail fraud against him. Williams targeted homeowners at risk of foreclosure and promised them that he would stop the foreclosure of their homes and cut their future mortgage payments in half. The catch? Williams required that the homeowners pay him an up-front fee of several thousands of dollars PLUS an amount equal to half of their mortgage payment every month thereafter. So, Williams simply replaced the homeowner's mortgage holder WITH HIMSELF on the receiving end of the homeowner's mortgage payment every month. Williams also gave every such homeowner a hand-signed, money-back guarantee promising them he would refund their money for any reason, no questions asked. Thereafter, Williams did nothing to stop the foreclosure of his victims' homes and instead diverted of the money he received to his own use. Williams sent the money he stole in Hawaii to his mother in Texas to hide it from his victims and from law enforcement authorities in Hawaii. Williams never honored a single, hand-signed, money-back guarantee. Williams' fraud in Hawaii involved over 200 properties or victims and netted Williams almost a quarter million dollars. Williams was previously convicted of an almost identical scam in Florida and was sentenced to 15 years plus 15 years of probation there.
Williams will likely spend the rest of his fife behind bars.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjJfLHDEAE8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5dO8FvDD4o
http
ReplyDeleteTHE TRUTH ABOUT FAKE LEGAL EXPERTS, LIKE ROD CLASS
For the hoaxes of ROD CLASS, Google "Rod Class And His Many Hoaxes", or click here.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99447-Rod-Class-his-many-hoaxes&p=1174970#post1174970
For the hoaxes of EDDIE CRAIG, Google "Eddie Craig And The Former Deputy Sheriff Hoax", or click here.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99564-Eddie-Craig-the-former-deputy-sheriff-hoax
For the hoaxes of CARL MILLER, Google "The Carl Miller Hoax", or click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?131638-Carl-Miller-Richard-Champion&p=229161#post229161
For the hoaxes of ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Google "The Anthony Williams Hoax", or click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?132863-The-anthony-williams-hoax-(anthony-troy-williams)&p=231677#post231677
For the hoaxes of DEBRA JONES, Google the "Debra Jones Hoax", or click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?132369-Debra-Jones-amp-quot-The-Debra-Jones-Hoax-quot&highlight=Debra+Jones&p=230352#post230352;
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?109244-Debra-Jones-The-Debra-Jones-Hoax.
For the hoaxes of DEBORAH TAVARES, Google "The Hoaxes OF Deborah Tavares", or click here. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?130336-The-hoaxes-of-deborah-tavares-(conspiracy-weaponized-weather-fires-depopulation)&p=226016
ANTHONY WILLIAMS SENTENCED TO 20 YEARS IN FEDERAL PRISON TO BEGIN AFTER HE FINISHES HIS 15 YEAR FLORIDA SENTENCE FOR A SIMILAR CRIME (A TOTAL OF 35 YEARS)
ReplyDeleteThe Federal District Court For The District Of Hawaii has sentenced amateur legal theorist and FAKE "Private Attorney General', Anthony Troy Williams to 20 years in federal prison for taking more than $230,000 from desperate homeowners in exchange for FAKE foreclosure rescue services which did not actually work.
Williams demanded thousands of dollars in up-front fees from each homeowner (for filing worthless "voodoo papers" in public record) and then demanded that each homeowner make lower monthly mortgage payments to him every month thereafter (rather than make full monthly mortgage payments to their mortgage holders every month thereafter). But, the homeowners eventually lost their homes to foreclosure anyway. Williams converted the money he stole from homeowners in this way into cash and then converted the cash into "money orders" (so as to avoid leaving a paper trail) and then sent it to his mother in Texas to hide for him in her name (so that law enforcement authorities would be unable to find it and return it to his victims).
Williams' 20 year federal sentence will not even begin to run until AFTER he has fully served his 15 year sentence in Florida for an earlier conviction of an almost identical crime that he committed in that state. So, Williams will serve a total of 35 years behind bars for almost identical crimes, minus the roughly 3 years he has served of his Florida sentence during the federal case against him in Hawaii.. The Federal District Court For The District Of Hawaii also ordered Williams to pay $230, 527.13 in restitution to his Hawaii victims.
OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASE
https://www.justice.gov/usao-hi/pr/fraudster-sentenced-20-years-imprisonment-connection-fraudulent-mortgage-debt-reduction
SEE ACTUAL LIVE FOOTAGE OF THE SENTENCING HEARING BELOW!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rR5_q-5I9iE&feature=youtu.be (AT 52:20)
ABOUT OTHER FAKE LEGAL EXPERTS WHO PRETEND TO KNOW THE LAW (all of whom have a 100% failure rate when representing themselves and when pretending to represent others) .
For the hoaxes of ROD CLASS (who has LOST 77+ consecutive cases in a row) , click here.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99447-Rod-Class-his-many-hoaxes
For the hoaxes of EDDIE CRAIG (who has LOST every case in which he has ever been involved), click here.http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99564-Eddie-Craig-the-former-deputy-sheriff-hoax
For the hoaxes of ANTHONY WILLIAMS (who has LOST 90+ consecutive cases in a row) , click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?132863-The-Anthony-Williams-Hoax-(Anthony-Troy-Williams)&p=231850#post231850
For the hoaxes of CARL MILLER (who has LOST 28 consecutive cases in a row), click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?131638-Carl-Miller-Richard-Champion
For the hoaxes of DEBRA JONES (who has never won or lost a single case), click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?132369-Debra-Jones-amp-quot-The-Debra-Jones-Hoax-quot&highlight=Debra+Jones&p=230352#post230352;
For the hoaxes of DEBORAH TAVARES (who has never won or lost a single case), click here.
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?130336-The-hoaxes-of-deborah-tavares-(conspiracy-weaponized-weather-fires-depopulation)&p=226016#post226016
let me guess: you're a desperate commie jew agent?
ReplyDelete